Decision-Making Prompt: Criteria, Weights, Scenarios
Turns a stuck decision into criteria, weights and scenarios, separating the choice from the emotion.
You are a decision analyst. Help me decide, without deciding for me. DECISION - Option A: [A] - Option B: [B] - Deadline: [DATE] - What is making this hard: [THE TENSION] STEP 1 — CRITERIA List the 5 criteria that actually matter here. For each: why it matters and how it would be measured. STEP 2 — WEIGHTS Assign weights summing to 100. Show your reasoning in one line per weight. STEP 3 — SCORE Table: criterion | weight | A score (1-5) | B score (1-5) | weighted difference. Be explicit about which scores are guesses. STEP 4 — SCENARIOS Three futures: base case, worse than expected, better than expected. For each, which option is easier to live with and why. STEP 5 — REVERSIBILITY Which option is easier to undo, how long the undo window is, and what it costs. STEP 6 — THE QUESTION BEHIND THE QUESTION What is the real decision underneath this one? (e.g. not "which job" but "whether to optimise for money or learning".) STEP 7 — RECOMMENDATION One option, three sentences of reasoning, and the single piece of information that would flip the recommendation. RULES - Do not tell me what I want to hear. If both options are bad, say so and propose a third. - Do not invent data; label guesses as guesses. - No motivational language.
If you cannot name the criterion that would flip your choice, you are not deciding, you are waiting.
02 — Variables
Fill in the brackets
The highlighted fields are the places where your own details go. You do not have to fill all of them; anything left empty is completed by the model's own assumption.
[DATE]
[THE TENSION]
03 — How to use
How to use it, step by step
- 01
Fill "what is making this hard" honestly — that sentence usually contains the real criterion.
- 02
The reversibility step resolves most stuck decisions faster than the scoring.
- 03
Ask for the flip condition; it tells you what to research next.
04 — Variations
Same prompt, different result
One prompt does not solve every case. These variations ask for the same job in a different tone, length or format — pick the one that fits.
Buying decision
Same structure for a purchase: total cost of ownership over 3 years, not sticker price.
Hiring decision
Same structure for a hire: must-have vs trainable, and the cost of a wrong hire in months.
05 — Tips
Notes that take the result up a level
- Weighted scores feel objective but the weights are subjective. The value is in making the weights explicit, not in the total.
- If both options score within 5 points, the decision is not about the criteria — it is about the question behind the question.
06 — FAQ
Frequently asked about Work and Productivity
Can a model decide for me?
It can structure the decision, which is most of the work. It cannot know your risk tolerance or what you will regret, which is the part that decides.
Why include a third option?
Because most stuck decisions are false binaries. The model is asked to propose one if both options look weak.
Next
You may also find these useful
Meeting Notes Summary Prompt (Decisions + Actions)
Splits meeting notes into three clean parts: decisions, actions with owners, and what stayed open.
Beginner ChatGPTClaudeProfessional Email Prompt (Including Difficult Messages)
Decline, chase, apologise and raise prices without damaging the relationship. One-purpose emails with a clear ask.
Beginner ChatGPTClaudeBusiness Plan Prompt: One Page You Will Actually Use
Instead of a 40-page template, a one-page plan that gets used: customer, value, revenue, cost and the first 90 days.
Intermediate ChatGPTClaudePresentation Prompt: Slide-by-Slide Structure
One message per slide instead of text-filled slides, with speaker notes carrying the detail.
IntermediateThis page was prepared by the CopyPromt editorial team, first published 24 October 2026. Prompts are written to work across models; brand names are mentioned for identification only.